Google does not care what the European law says



“It’s the same Google experience that you’re used to, with the same controls,” said the company about its new privacy rules on Thursday.


googleAnnounced in January 24 and despite warnings from the EU earlier this week, Google’s highly controversial privacy changes took place on March 1st. European justice commissioner insisted they are in breach of European law. France’s regulator CNIL expressed its deep concern about the cross data and launched a Europe-wide investigation.

“[The CNIL and EU data authorities] have strong doubts about the lawfulness and fairness of such processing, and its compliance with European data protection legislation,” the CNIL stated.

So far, given its preliminary findings, the CNIL suggests Google has breached the law.  Last week, 36 attorneys general in the United States and its territories qualified the new policy as an “invasion of privacy” in a letter to Google’s CEO, Larry Page. Privacy groups like the U.S.-based Electronic Privacy Information Center, have sued in federal court to get the Federal Trade Commission to stop the change.

Yet Google didn’t change a comma. It claims the changes are perfectly legal and they will allow it to streamline the user experience, creating more helpful and compelling services.

“We know there has been a fair amount of chatter and confusion (…) We won’t be selling your personal data,” Director of Privacy, Product and Engineering Alma Whitten, reckons at the company’s blog.

What is new, in a nutshell:

  • Google is not collecting any new information but sharing it with itself: the activity in the firm’s 60 websites will be linked (YouTube, Gmail and Blogger).
  • The Internet giant says that it is committed to data liberation, an engineering team at the firm that helps users to move their data in and out of the company’s products.  But users cannot opt out unless they stop using Google’s services. For example, people with smartphones running on Google’s Android software, who signed two-year contracts, can either switch to non-Google services (that typically don’t work as well on Android software) or buy a different smartphone and pay an early-termination penalty.
  • It is not clear how long Google keeps your data even after you’ve asked it to stop tracking you.

Google’s business is to sell advertisement targeted on individual user behaviour. The more browsing information it can collect from its visitors, the more ads it can get. Many media and technology bloggers have strongly critiziced the company’s switch and have adviced consumers to enhance their privacy settings or minimize their exposure.

“What Google hasn’t spent much time talking about is how being able to draw more revealing profiles about its users will help sell advertising — the main source of its $38 billion in annual revenue,” published Fox News.

Notwithstanding, there are voices pointing out the accusations are premature and could be unfair.

“It remains to be seen what the EU’s privacy sleuths unearth when they comb through the details of Google’s latest tweaks. The firm is certainly under competitive pressure to generate an all-round view of its users’ behaviour online so that it can target ads at them more efficiently. In pushing through its changes, Google may have broken EU rules, either knowingly or unknowingly, but the facts have yet to be presented that demonstrate this is indeed what has happened,” states The Economist. “The company should be treated as innocent until proven guilty.”

About the Author

Ana Fuentes
Columnist for El País and a contributor to SER (Sociedad Española de Radiodifusión), was the first editor-in-chief of The Corner. Currently based in Madrid, she has been a correspondent in New York, Beijing and Paris for several international media outlets such as Prisa Radio, Radio Netherlands or CNN en español. Ana holds a degree in Journalism from the Complutense University in Madrid and the Sorbonne University in Paris, and a Master's in Journalism from Spanish newspaper El País.

1 Comment on "Google does not care what the European law says"

  1. Europe poker sites that are licensed inside the EU are able to offer their citizens tax-free poker winnings; this is a great tax law that benefits players and implements the policy of open borders. But the law regarding gambling providers is taking another turn; with separate licenses in every EU country and even look-in in some countries (France). Is this legal according to EU law?

Leave a comment